A small hand resting in an adult's open palm — whether a minor can enter into a contract

Commentary Contract Law

Can a minor enter into a contract?

Summary

A minor may enter into contracts, but most of them cannot be enforced against the minor. In Trinidad and Tobago, full age is attained at eighteen. By statute, contracts for the repayment of money lent to a minor, and contracts for the supply of goods other than necessaries, are absolutely void. A minor must, however, pay a reasonable price for necessaries actually delivered. A minor is also bound by contracts of employment, apprenticeship or training that are, on the whole, for the minor's benefit.

Last reviewed 22 September 2026

Full age. A person attains full age at eighteen (Age of Majority Act, s 2).

Void contracts. Under s 19 of the Infants Act, three kinds of contract entered into by a minor are absolutely void: contracts for the repayment of money lent or to be lent, contracts for goods supplied or to be supplied (other than necessaries), and all accounts stated (that is, agreed statements of the balance owed on an account). The minor cannot be sued on any of them.

Necessaries. Where necessaries are sold and delivered to a minor, the minor must pay a reasonable price for them (Sale of Goods Act, s 4). That price may differ from the contract price. Necessaries are goods suitable to the minor's condition in life and to the minor's actual requirements at the time of sale and delivery. The seller bears the burden of proving both elements, including that the minor was not already adequately supplied with goods of that kind. Articles of mere luxury are always excluded, although articles of utility that are costly may in some cases qualify.

Voidable contracts. Certain contracts confer on the minor an interest of a continuing nature, such as a lease, a partnership, or a holding of shares. Such a contract binds the minor unless the minor repudiates it before attaining full age or within a reasonable time afterwards.

Contracts binding on the minor. A contract of employment, apprenticeship or training binds a minor if, taken as a whole, it is substantially for the minor's benefit. A trading contract does not bind a minor, however beneficial it may be. Examples include the purchase of stock for a business, or the hire of equipment to be used in earning a living.

Ratification after full age. No action may be brought on a promise made after full age to pay a debt contracted during minority, or on a ratification made after full age of a contract entered into during minority (Infants Act, s 20).

Practical implications

A business that extends credit or lends money to a person under eighteen does so at its own risk. The contract is void, and the price of goods other than necessaries cannot be recovered by action.

A misrepresentation of age does not alter the position. A minor who obtains a loan by falsely claiming to be of full age cannot be compelled to repay it. Where a minor has obtained goods by such a misrepresentation and still has them, the court may order the goods to be returned, but it will not order the minor to pay their value.

The protection conferred on a minor is a shield against enforcement. It does not confer a general right to a refund. Where a minor repudiates a contract, money already paid is recoverable only if there has been a total failure of consideration, that is, only if the minor received none of what was bargained for.

A gold coin beside a wristwatch in a wooden case on dark marble — money, value and what a contract exchanges
The coin and the watch. Money lent, and goods that are not necessaries.

A business that contracts with persons under eighteen on credit or on continuing terms should verify the customer's age at the outset. Where the customer is a minor, the parent or guardian should enter into the contract as the principal party, whether as buyer or borrower, rather than as guarantor. A guarantee of a debt that is void against the minor may itself be unenforceable.

Contracts of service with young persons, such as athletes, performers and apprentices, should be drafted on fair terms that are demonstrably for the young person's benefit. An oppressive contract of service will not bind the minor.

A person who has recently attained full age and is asked to confirm a debt incurred during minority should note that such a confirmation cannot be sued upon. That does not extinguish liability for necessaries already delivered. Nor does it release the person from a lease or similar continuing contract that was not repudiated within a reasonable time after attaining full age. Advice should be obtained before any new document is signed.

Important notice. This commentary is a general statement of the law of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and is provided for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and it is not to be relied upon as legal advice or as a complete or current statement of the law. The law may have changed since the date of last review. Readers should verify all information for themselves, including the current text of any legislation referred to, and should obtain legal advice on their particular circumstances before acting, or refraining from acting, on anything in this commentary. Reading this commentary does not create an attorney-client relationship, and no responsibility is accepted for any loss arising from reliance on it. Any decision of a court referred to in this commentary is cited for the principle it states; similar results cannot be guaranteed, and a decision may be subject to appeal or change.

Tell me what has happened.

A few sentences is enough to know whether you have a matter and what it would take.

Make an enquiry Call +1 (868) 338-8895 WhatsApp